The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, agreed to examine whether the Kerala High Court overstepped its judicial powers by annulling the marriage of Hadiya alias Akhila Ashokan with Shafin Jahan in what has come to be known popularly as the Kerala love jihad case. The father can not say he should have 24-hour custody of her.
The bench also wondered whether the 24-year-old woman could be forced to live in her father's custody.
Shafin Jahan, has filed an another plea in SC challenging the HC order saying it was an "an insult to the independence of woman in India".
The SC in August had ordered a NIA probe into the plea of a Muslim man Shafin Jahan whose marriage with a Hindu woman (Hadiya) was annulled by the Kerala High Court, which had termed it a "love jihad".
The apex court has posted the case for October 9.
Meanwhile, the NIA has pointed to a "pattern" of a series of similar incidents of conversion and marriage. Jahan has in turn pleaded with the Supreme Court to cancel the NIA probe.
Facebook: About 10 million people saw Russian-backed ads
Facebook had shown the ads to congressional investigators but not turned them over. Both sides are upset about ideas and content they don't like.
"Can the High Court, under Article 226, nullify a marriage...we want logical, legal arguments on this".
However, Hadiya's father, has maintained that his daughter was a "helpless victim" trapped by a "well-oiled racket" which used "psychological measures" to indoctrinate people and convert them to Islam.
The woman is presently in her parents' custody at their house near Kottayam.
"State is not in appeal, father is not in appeal, NIA is not in appeal".
Shafeen Jahan married Akhila Ashokan in December previous year after she converted to Islam and rechristened herself as Hadiya. In the interest of justice it would be appropriate and just to recall the order of this Court dated August 16, 2017 to the extent of the directions to NIA to investigate this matter, and direct the Detenue to be produced before this Court, he said in the application. "Will Your Lordships order an NIA probe into these marriages too?" It was alleged that the woman was recruited by the ISIS's mission in Syria and Jahan was only a stooge.
The HC that said it is essential for the parents to be present at the wedding, also made clear that Shafeen had no authority or right to be Hadiya's ward.
- Dave Strader, NHL broadcaster from Glens Falls, dies
- Rubio: US Military Should Be Put in Charge of Puerto Rico
- Rangana Herath becomes first left-arm spinner to pick 400 Test wickets
- Researchers develop smart tattoos that use color changing ink for medical info
- Rex Tillerson May Be Directly Negotiating With Kim Jong Un
- Iraq ex-president and Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani dead
- Honeypreet, Rapist Gurmeet's daughter surrenders in Zirakpur
- Chelsea's Alvaro Morata suffers hamstring injury, could be out for six weeks
- Eagles face off against Chargers after franchise-record breaking win
- Apple Finally Selling iPhone Dongle for Headphone and Charging