It referred the case back to the General Court, ordering it to examine Intel's arguments about whether the rebates were capable of restricting competition in the way that the Commission claimed.
The ruling to send the case back to EU General Court says that previously, not all of Intel's arguments were taken into account when making the final ruling.
Though Intel challenged the commission's fine, the European General Court dismissed Intel's appeal in 2014.
While CURIA's ruling potentially opens the door for Intel to have the fine reduced or even written off in its entirety the company also had other arguments fully dismissed: Intel's claims that the EU Commission lacked territorial jurisdiction to fine a USA company and allegations of procedural irregularities that affected the company's rights of defence were both rejected by CURIA.
The EU court has brought the European Commission one step closer to its first bloody nose on anti-trust fines.
Tiger killed after wild run through Georgia neighbourhood
As the school day approached, officers also said they didn't want any children to be in danger as they waited at their bus stops. Henry County police say drivers spotted the tiger early Wednesday on Interstate 75 in Stockbridge, southeast of Atlanta .
The US tech giant, which has its European manufacturing headquarters in Leixlip, Co Kildare, appealed the fine to the General Court in Luxembourg.
"The Commission takes note of today's ruling by the European Court of Justice (Case C-413/14 P) and will study the judgment carefully", a spokesperson for the European Commission said in an emailed statement. "The ECJ's decision is also good news for consumers, because dominant companies may now have more flexibility in offering rebates to high-volume buyers". The Brussels-based antitrust regulator accused the company of using discounts to hurt Advanced Micro Devices Inc., a decision backed by a lower European Union court in 2014.
In its appeal, Intel had disputed the application and findings of the AEC test.
While the commission argued the company's rebates were by their nature anticompetitive, it also carried out an in-depth analysis of the circumstances, proving the rebate scheme was capable of shutting out a rival.
- Darling: Attach Cut, Cap, and Balance to Debt Limit Hike
- Dealing with key injuries, Aggies putting deflating loss in rear view
- Fed Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer submits resignation for "personal reasons"
- Spanish PM Requests High Court Recognize Bids on Catalan Independense Illegal
- Putin Says At This Point, Sanctions Against North Korea Are 'Useless'
- Terror funding case: NIA raids 11places
- Democratic Sen. Tester, Who Voted Against DREAM Act, Criticizes Trump DACA Repeal
- Elliott's National Football League suspension upheld
- N. Korea tests nuclear bomb, S. Korea says
- Narendra Modi Meets Suu Kyi, Discusses India-Myanmar Relations